Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Based Adaptive Learning on the Academic Achievement and Self-Regulated Learning of Secondary School Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Authors

  • Chandani Thakur Research Scholar, M.Ed., College of Education, IIMT University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • Lakshmi Saxena Assistant Professor, College of Education, IIMT University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.icaces.6

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, adaptive learning, academic achievement, self-regulated learning, secondary education, NEP 2020

Abstract

The promise of artificial intelligence (AI) in education is that software which adapts to each learner might deliver, at scale, some of the benefit of one-to-one tutoring. This study tested that promise in an Indian secondary classroom. Using a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test non-equivalent control group design, it examined the effect of an AI-based adaptive learning programme on the academic achievement in Science and the self-regulated learning of Class IX students, and asked whether boys and girls benefited equally. Eighty students of a CBSE-affiliated school in Meerut formed the sample, split into an experimental group (n = 40) that learned a Science unit through an adaptive platform and a control group (n = 40) taught the same content conventionally, over six weeks. A researcher-made Science Achievement Test (KR-20 = 0.84) and an adapted Self-Regulated Learning Scale (α = 0.88) were administered before and after the intervention, and the data were analysed using the t-test and analysis of covariance. The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on post-test achievement (t = 7.34, p < .01; d = 1.66), an advantage that survived adjustment for pre-test scores by ANCOVA (F = 48.60, p < .01), and reported significantly higher self-regulated learning (t = 5.62, p < .01; d = 1.27). Achievement gains did not differ significantly between boys and girls (t = 0.62, p > .05). The findings indicate that AI-based adaptive learning, used to support rather than replace the teacher, can improve both what students learn and how they manage their learning, with implications for the technology agenda of the National Education Policy 2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

[2] Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16.

[3] Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278.

[4] Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

[5] Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78.

[6] Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

[7] Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.

[8] Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2015). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation.

[9] Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

[10] VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.

[11] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27.

[12] Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Thakur, C., & Saxena, L. (2026). Effect of Artificial Intelligence-Based Adaptive Learning on the Academic Achievement and Self-Regulated Learning of Secondary School Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 5(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.icaces.6

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.